Variations on a Theme of Chopin (Mompou)
'Chopin' from Carnaval, Op. 9 (Schumann)
Studie 'Hommage à Chopin' from Stimmungen, Op. 73 (Grieg)
Nocturne, Op. 33 (Barber)
Un poco di Chopin from 18 Pieces, Op. 72 (Tchaikovsky)
Variations on a Theme of Chopin, Op. 22 (Rachmaninov)
Variations on theme from Mozart's Don Giovanni, Op. 2 (Chopin)
Sonata No. 2 in b-flat minor, Op. 35 (Chopin)
Encore: Fantasy-Impromptu in C-Sharp Minor, Op. 66 (Chopin)
Largo from Cello Sonata (Chopin, arr. Cortot)
Daniil Trifonov (piano)
12 October 2017, Hong Kong City Hall Concert Hall:
4 Duettos, BWV 802-805 (Bach)
Rondon in G, Op. 51, No. 2 (Beethoven)
Sonata No. 3 in C, Op. 2, No. 3 (Beethoven)
Fantaisie, Op. 49 (Chopin)
Nocturne in f-sharp minor, No. 48, No. 2 (Chopin)
Sonata No. 2 in b-flat minor, Op. 35 (Chopin)
Encore: Intermezzo in A, Op. 118, No. 2 (Brahms)
Rafał Blechacz (piano)
Less than a month after Daniil Trifonov's Chopin themed recital, Chopin's works again filled the second half of Rafał Blechacz's programme. Both had the second piano sonata as the concluding item, yet the two approached differently. One felt Trifonov was rather expressive and romantically driven, whereas intimacy and inner emotions marked in Blechacz's playing.
When Blechacz played the short prelude in A major as his final encore, it reminded us of Mompou's theme and variations that Trifonov began his recital. Despite the vast acoustic of cultural centre concert hall, one enjoyed the soft and sedate opening. It led to a lyrical passage marked by contrasting dynamics before resolving to the dreamy state again. The dotted passage felt pondering than carrying a direction though, and became rather cloudy in the tender and tuneful theme. At reaching the expressive and passionate climax, Rachmaninov seems more in mind by the harmonic colours and rhythmic patterns. Trifonov restrained from keyboard bombardment in the fantasia like gallop but instead gave a rather feminine touch to it. The four short pieces by Schumann, Grieg, Barber and Tchaikovsky as hommage to Chopin was an interesting selection. Grieg's approach reminded me of Rachmaninov than Chopin by the expressive arpeggios, whereas Barber harmonically was rather modern looking with the mysterious outlook that gone very distanced from Chopin. Tchaikovsky though lacked a definite outlook but only soft and tuneful.
Despite Rachmaninov referenced the funeral march from the third movement of Chopin's second sonata in his theme and variations, his idea went beyond the original with a rather symphonic sound world in mind. Trifonov kept the slow march flowing than indulging on the tragic sentiments. A mysterious and sorrow start to the fugue,which then developed into a lively and complex progression. Spread chords were expressively played and not aggressively hammer. A brief romantically driven passage followed by a crushing and wild gallop. Contrasting dynamics created immense emotional contrast and later it developed into another mysterious and unsettling transition. Then it galloped into a broad and muscular sound world with sheer intensity, in contrast to the fantasia like development that later lightened up by a lyrical theme. A triumphant and exuberant climax was given yet Trifonov rightly so to play the return of funeral march as devastating and bold than before.
The second half though lacked the brilliancy and lost focus. Variations on the theme from Mozart's Don Giovanni recalled those technical showcase piece by Liszt, but it did not feel right for Trifonov. His playing became untidy and phrasing seems random. Gallops were sometimes out of shape and sounded blurry by being sticky on the pedal. Later he was impatient in the first movement of the second sonata by hurrying through. It felt like a tense pressing after a lyrical resolve but never reach. Employing the same approach became dull for the ears and lacked contrast in colours. Questionable phrasing again in the second movement that did not carry the dance momentum but only as a rhythmic exercise. Nevertheless, he regained the calm and submissive touch in the tender interlude that at times was spellbinding and effective. Cloudy tone resurfaced at recapitulation even it was energetically driven. The funeral march of the third movement recalled the Russian context alike Rachmaninov early on. Trifonov seems more at home in building up the majestic crescendo in contrast to the still and lullaby like passage, which the softness magically stayed on the same level without losing the intention. As the funeral march returned, the emotions culminated again for the sheer devastation. Twice I listened to the short and chromatic styled fourth movement, one still could not understand by its purpose. Perhaps I was tired by then or Trifonov employed too much rubato without a clear intention, neither the Fantasy-Impromptu or arrangement of the cello sonata interested me anymore.
The acoustic of City hall concert hall is more ideal for solo instrumental recital with a warmer sound, and more in proportion by the smaller performing space than the cultural centre. It elevated Blechacz's smooth and delicate playing into a beautiful tone throughout. He began the Bach tidily and aimed for the counterpoint in the first movement. Each thematic entry at the fugue of second movement was introduced clearly and structurally transparent. The good work continued into the third movement and kept the momentum flowing. His ornamentation sank naturally into the tricky rhythmic patterns of the fourth movement with the dynamic differentiation that created a colourful sound world. However, I did not enjoy his interpretation of Beethoven's Rondo in G as much as the other works. It felt he was hurrying along and rather mechanical in approach, which pushed the tempo too quickly than letting the music to sing. The attacks were rather sudden and shapeless by his playing being impatient.
In turn, he had shown more thoughts and interest for Beethoven's third piano sonata. A muscular flourish opened the piece and the progression flowed tightly that had the intention to move forward. Though he could have been more relax in the soft passage by being more tender than tense It would have allowed more dynamic contrast from the dense and bold interlude followed. Composition wise it seems Beethoven wanted to experiment new harmonic language and those thoughts were given a quick glimpse. Blechacz maintained the smoothness and clarity as the music descended to the lowest range before repeating the opening theme. The second movement was romantically driven at first but at the end the classical style returned, which was more optimistic than the tragic sentiment in first place. Spellbinding tenderness during the quiet and soft passage that sustained the textual silkiness. Scherzo of the third movement was probably the most experimental of the whole work. Harmonically complex and structurally dense but leaving an open end without a clear resolve. Blechacz kept the rhythmic excitement by aiming at the spring board to the next phrase that began the fourth movement. The heavily scaled passage carried the sheer intensity with forward momentum and again Beethoven experimented ideas before a conventional closing.
Chopin's Fantaisie began rather mysteriously and moody. It was rather inward looking before a climatic built up from the soft and lyrical theme into a vigorous dance. Blechacz's left hand was sometimes heavier than the right but still able to maintain the clarity. He preferred a tidy and unhurried playing in the flourish than a technical run off with bold gesture. Nocturne in f sharp minor is a more typical Chopin piece with the subtlety and calmness more familiar with. Tenderness and the intimate sentiment were sustained throughout that a grand overview.
Compare to Trifonov's interpretation, Blechacz approached the first movement of the second piano sonata with a more sustained and legato playing. Even the expressive gallop stayed subtle which lightened the emotional flourish. Yet the progression stayed tightly and maintained the direction. Structural clarity was achieved even at romantically driven passage than over expressing. This time the second movement still had the virtuosic impression but managed to carry in a rich tone. It was gentler and more sedate through articulating the contrast between intimacy and rhythmic excitement. Funeral march of the third march was also given a lighter touch and flowed in boldness. Dynamic contrast was more faithfully observed to avoid being dense and over sentimental. The lyrical theme was highly moving by the sensitive touch with lightness, before the funeral march reappeared majestically. Intermezzo in A by Brahms put the smile back on the face and ended this performance on a satisfying high point.
Daniil Trifonov (piano)
12 October 2017, Hong Kong City Hall Concert Hall:
4 Duettos, BWV 802-805 (Bach)
Rondon in G, Op. 51, No. 2 (Beethoven)
Sonata No. 3 in C, Op. 2, No. 3 (Beethoven)
Fantaisie, Op. 49 (Chopin)
Nocturne in f-sharp minor, No. 48, No. 2 (Chopin)
Sonata No. 2 in b-flat minor, Op. 35 (Chopin)
Encore: Intermezzo in A, Op. 118, No. 2 (Brahms)
Rafał Blechacz (piano)
When Blechacz played the short prelude in A major as his final encore, it reminded us of Mompou's theme and variations that Trifonov began his recital. Despite the vast acoustic of cultural centre concert hall, one enjoyed the soft and sedate opening. It led to a lyrical passage marked by contrasting dynamics before resolving to the dreamy state again. The dotted passage felt pondering than carrying a direction though, and became rather cloudy in the tender and tuneful theme. At reaching the expressive and passionate climax, Rachmaninov seems more in mind by the harmonic colours and rhythmic patterns. Trifonov restrained from keyboard bombardment in the fantasia like gallop but instead gave a rather feminine touch to it. The four short pieces by Schumann, Grieg, Barber and Tchaikovsky as hommage to Chopin was an interesting selection. Grieg's approach reminded me of Rachmaninov than Chopin by the expressive arpeggios, whereas Barber harmonically was rather modern looking with the mysterious outlook that gone very distanced from Chopin. Tchaikovsky though lacked a definite outlook but only soft and tuneful.
Despite Rachmaninov referenced the funeral march from the third movement of Chopin's second sonata in his theme and variations, his idea went beyond the original with a rather symphonic sound world in mind. Trifonov kept the slow march flowing than indulging on the tragic sentiments. A mysterious and sorrow start to the fugue,which then developed into a lively and complex progression. Spread chords were expressively played and not aggressively hammer. A brief romantically driven passage followed by a crushing and wild gallop. Contrasting dynamics created immense emotional contrast and later it developed into another mysterious and unsettling transition. Then it galloped into a broad and muscular sound world with sheer intensity, in contrast to the fantasia like development that later lightened up by a lyrical theme. A triumphant and exuberant climax was given yet Trifonov rightly so to play the return of funeral march as devastating and bold than before.
The second half though lacked the brilliancy and lost focus. Variations on the theme from Mozart's Don Giovanni recalled those technical showcase piece by Liszt, but it did not feel right for Trifonov. His playing became untidy and phrasing seems random. Gallops were sometimes out of shape and sounded blurry by being sticky on the pedal. Later he was impatient in the first movement of the second sonata by hurrying through. It felt like a tense pressing after a lyrical resolve but never reach. Employing the same approach became dull for the ears and lacked contrast in colours. Questionable phrasing again in the second movement that did not carry the dance momentum but only as a rhythmic exercise. Nevertheless, he regained the calm and submissive touch in the tender interlude that at times was spellbinding and effective. Cloudy tone resurfaced at recapitulation even it was energetically driven. The funeral march of the third movement recalled the Russian context alike Rachmaninov early on. Trifonov seems more at home in building up the majestic crescendo in contrast to the still and lullaby like passage, which the softness magically stayed on the same level without losing the intention. As the funeral march returned, the emotions culminated again for the sheer devastation. Twice I listened to the short and chromatic styled fourth movement, one still could not understand by its purpose. Perhaps I was tired by then or Trifonov employed too much rubato without a clear intention, neither the Fantasy-Impromptu or arrangement of the cello sonata interested me anymore.
In turn, he had shown more thoughts and interest for Beethoven's third piano sonata. A muscular flourish opened the piece and the progression flowed tightly that had the intention to move forward. Though he could have been more relax in the soft passage by being more tender than tense It would have allowed more dynamic contrast from the dense and bold interlude followed. Composition wise it seems Beethoven wanted to experiment new harmonic language and those thoughts were given a quick glimpse. Blechacz maintained the smoothness and clarity as the music descended to the lowest range before repeating the opening theme. The second movement was romantically driven at first but at the end the classical style returned, which was more optimistic than the tragic sentiment in first place. Spellbinding tenderness during the quiet and soft passage that sustained the textual silkiness. Scherzo of the third movement was probably the most experimental of the whole work. Harmonically complex and structurally dense but leaving an open end without a clear resolve. Blechacz kept the rhythmic excitement by aiming at the spring board to the next phrase that began the fourth movement. The heavily scaled passage carried the sheer intensity with forward momentum and again Beethoven experimented ideas before a conventional closing.
Chopin's Fantaisie began rather mysteriously and moody. It was rather inward looking before a climatic built up from the soft and lyrical theme into a vigorous dance. Blechacz's left hand was sometimes heavier than the right but still able to maintain the clarity. He preferred a tidy and unhurried playing in the flourish than a technical run off with bold gesture. Nocturne in f sharp minor is a more typical Chopin piece with the subtlety and calmness more familiar with. Tenderness and the intimate sentiment were sustained throughout that a grand overview.
Compare to Trifonov's interpretation, Blechacz approached the first movement of the second piano sonata with a more sustained and legato playing. Even the expressive gallop stayed subtle which lightened the emotional flourish. Yet the progression stayed tightly and maintained the direction. Structural clarity was achieved even at romantically driven passage than over expressing. This time the second movement still had the virtuosic impression but managed to carry in a rich tone. It was gentler and more sedate through articulating the contrast between intimacy and rhythmic excitement. Funeral march of the third march was also given a lighter touch and flowed in boldness. Dynamic contrast was more faithfully observed to avoid being dense and over sentimental. The lyrical theme was highly moving by the sensitive touch with lightness, before the funeral march reappeared majestically. Intermezzo in A by Brahms put the smile back on the face and ended this performance on a satisfying high point.
