Showing posts with label Elgar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Elgar. Show all posts

Review - Oslo Philharmonic and Vasily Petrenko, 2017 Hong Kong Arts Festival

14 March 2017:
Peer Gynt Suite No 1 (Grieg)
Cello Concerto No 1 (Shostakovich)
Symphony No 2 (Rachmaninov)

15 March 2017:
Excerpts from 100 Folk Tunes from Hardanger (Tveitt)
Cello Concerto (Elgar)
Symphony No 2 (Sibelius)

Oslo Philharmonic
Truls Mørk (Cello)
Vasily Petrenko (Conductor)


A fine selection of symphonic and concerto works from the late romantic period up to the post war period were given by the leading Norwegian orchestra. Though the weakest moment happened at the start in the iconic Peer Gynt Suite by Grieg. Whether due to Petrenko being impatient with the tempo or the orchestra was sight reading the score, woodwinds' dialogues depicting the scene of rising sun in the well known morning mood were messy at entries. Their playing lacked a flowing momentum with much hesitation and uncertainty in direction. Strings' sorrow theme on lamenting the death of Aase were more secured and flowing. It achieved a spellbinding pianissimo, but one could sense that Petrenko rather preferred to move things forward than indulging broadly. Strings were also able to produce the lightness and dynamic contrast in the tipsy dance like third movement. Though the wild gallop at the hall of the mountain king was somehow underwhelming that lacked the energy by its indifferent playing.

Shostakovich's first cello concerto in turn marked a contrast from the optimistic sunny outlook by an enigmatic impression. It began with the solo cello playing at the end of fingerboard, and felt like ironic and restless. Solo horn's entry though was late and not secure with tuning. Screaming winds and heavily scored solo cello part continued until it came to an abrupt end. A sorrow start to the second movement by the solo cello again and this time inward looking yet tragic. Violas and clarinet played a gloomy and lifeless Russian folk tune, later increasingly eerie and grotesque as the music became more dissonant from the celesta and strings. Emotional anguish was realised by the solo cello with double stopping in wide interval jumps and irregular rhythmic patterns. It made a dramatic contrast to the lament expressed at the meditative start of the third movement. The orchestral response was sarcastic but the tone quality of the horns did not match the rest. A stormy coda with wild cries and hurried gallops from the winds and strings. For encore, Truls Mørk played a movement from Bach's cello suite that carried a sense of solitude.

Emotional outpour and the unending search for positivism in Rachmaninov's second symphony finally gave assurance and hope, which departed from the sadness that dominated the first half. Despite a bleak and dark beginning, emotions gradually culminated and eventually some glimpse of positivism. Beautiful strings playing at the dance like section, subtle and seamless in the romantic driven dialogue between parts. Ebbs and flows of movement produced waves of emotional charge, though constantly negotiated between tragic and optimism. Brass made devastating cries that heightened the tension and conjured a rather tempestuous scene. In turn, strings responded with a sweet tune at the unison lyric passage before plunging back into the intense conflict. Momentum sustained as the playing descended into the lower range with an explosive ending to the first movement. Romantically rich tune began the second movement with a fiery gallop, which the strings' attacks were dramatic and swift. The heroic ride developed from a fast and passionate drive into a full scale of wildness. Horns' tone quality improved at forte with a sheer dramatic impression.

Calmness returned at the third movement with a sublime and tender clarinet solo. Strings responded to Petrenko's indications on dynamic difference, and again created waves of emotions to build climatic points one after another without any lingering. The dialogue between solo clarinet and violas had a wonderful sense in phrasing the lines. Ethereal sweetness rounded off the third movement in a sublime heavenward climax. Sheer brilliancy during the triumphant and carnival like start to the last movement, which the orchestral playing flowed with strong direction. It was answered by a sweet and expressive passage before a stormy transition returned. The contrast was marked by the dynamic change from the softest dynamic into another muscular climatic point. A resounding finale as the match towards the coda coupled with fanfare to give an ultra romantic send off. It was definitely a very memorable and brilliant deliverance from Petrenko and the Oslo Philharmonic.

In terms of produced tone quality and technical security, the second evening had the edge as the orchestra felt more at home with the hall acoustics. Tveitt's adaptations of folk tunes showed a variety of orchestral effects and moods even short in durations. The gallop built on a witty folk tune until it reached an explosive end in Friar-foter. A sorrow theme was played on the strings which began the next movement titled 'Du' with a haunting impression, but softened up by the winds playing a sweet tune. Percussive effects was focused in the following Langeleik tune with pizzicato and col legno on strings. Instead the brass played a deformed tune at a muscular tutti section near the end for a sarcastic portrayal of a drunken wedding party. The last movement, titled 'Hardanger ale', was majesty in style and had some influence of the blue music. A tipsy theme on the brass developed into a glorious fanfare, joined by the whole battery of percussions, for a colourful and festive finale.

For me, Elgar's cello concerto is a difficult piece to understand compare to his other works. Whether because it dwells on raw emotions in full tragical sense, or the absence of a noble and sentimental theme, one never know how to embrace the enigmatic outlook. Truls Mørk employed a lot of vibrato in his playing at the sorrow start, which accommodated by the lower strings and winds at a considering pianissimo. Though the climb to the end of fingerboard was not entirely smooth, Mørk probably preferred a more relaxing tempo whereas Petrenko tried to push the orchestra's playing forward. Interestingly tuning was not too good at first position even with a lesser reach for the fingers. Strings were more able to shape and dramatise the music from the moody part into a charging tremolo. A romantic and emotional start to the middle movement, which was tender and meditative throughout. Orchestra remained sensitive to dynamic balance and never overwhelm the soloist. The solo cello took the lead again in the third movement with an emotional outpour yet tragic by style. Notes heavy on the solo part compare to the flickering texture in the orchestral parts, which rhythmically more energetic in driving the momentum forward. Towards coda, it again went into a negotiation between mixed feelings with melancholy strings one hand and sorrowful solo cello the other. The unending gallop at soft dynamic rather bewildering by its infinite direction and left an open end impression where it was heading to.

The ice cold vast landscape in Sibelius's second symphony was the answer, but Petrenko also injected much thoughts and insight in his conducting to aim for a dramatic rendition with sonic impact. Strings and winds began the dance like opening in a rich bodied tone and passionate playing to draw out the emotions in full. Tempo was on the swift side made a strong sense of direction to sustain the energy and momentum. Blazing brass fanfares that muscular in sound with urgency to drive the music further forward. It made a fiery impression and injected more warmth to the tone colour. A moment of tranquillity returned at the beginning of the second movement when the bassoon played a noble folk tune with pizzicato on the lower strings. Though the peace was broken again by the explosive and emotional strings' parts against the devastating tragical calls from the winds. The image was increasingly bleak and violent til the end, while brass made a strong lead in the midst of the ebbs and flows of emotions. Despite the reappearance of the folk tune, it did not have the meditative stillness but tempestuous instead.

The storm continued into the third movement that reinforced dramatically by the brass again. There was a brief moment of lush sunny passage from the woodwinds but yet quickly restated by violence, which was rather sturm und drang by composition style. The last movement was sentimental and expressive as the strings built up a lush and majestic triumphant theme. It reached a solemn and heavenward climax but the negotiation did not stop. A variations on the theme followed until reaching an emotional outpour of an expressive theme. Lower strings in turn played a mournful chromatic march and developed into a thick textured furore. Even so, the coda was a victory over darkness after a long crescendo and blazing brass for a resounding finale. As a whole the performance managed to paint the picture vividly and one could felt the dramatic surroundings of nordic countryside.


Review - Vladimir Ashkenazy, Behzod Abduraimov, Hong Kong Philharmonic Orchestra, Hong Kong Cultural Centre Concert Hall, 2 July 2016

Piano Concerto No. 3 (Prokofiev)
Encore: Nocturne in d minor (Tchaikovsky)
Symphony No. 1 (Elgar)

Hong Kong Philharmonic Orchestra
Behzod Abduraimov (Pianist)
Vladimir Ashkenazy (Conductor)


The programmed works in this last concert of current season reminded me the performing experience with the university symphony orchestra few years ago. I remembered the Prokofiev being technically demanding for the pianist, also a clever exchange between wit, sarcasm and the occasional romanticism outpour.  The Elgar had a noble and beautiful theme, but textually thick and time signatures changed a lot particularly in first movement. The conductor is supposedly to know how to shape the music and make it interesting for the ears to avoid an intellectual rendition. I am not sure if this was the case with Ashkenazy directing from the podium. One admire and respect him as an acclaimed pianist, also his good personality to fellow musicians, but his conducting skills were not inspiring in all three performances I had encountered so far.

The clarinet solo played beautiful to begin the piano concerto, but mechanical conducting resulted in vertical reading of the score. The orchestral playing lacked interrelation and legato that being square in shape without direction. Thankfully, Abduraimov's playing was enchanting in the dissonant and mysterious bell like passage of the second theme. The eccentric and sarcastic impressions were well captured towards the crescendo climax. Though the melancholy gavotte in the beginning of second movement again lacked shape and felt more like a slow march than dance. The orchestral playing fell short from creating a structure in the ironic second variation and lacked differentiation in dynamics. Abduraimov again turned the disappointment away and delivered spellbinding playing in the haunting fourth variation. Tempo was well paced and produced a dreamlike atmosphere. He managed the contrast in dynamics, and responded to the mood change at the dramatic return of the violent fifth variation.

Tempo in the beginning of third movement was a bit steady that would need more anticipation. The coordination in the lyric passage between orchestra and soloist were accurate and together but slightly restrain emotionally. Though by the climatic point the orchestra began to drag the tempo too much. Ashkenazy's conducting did not indicate the phrasing by only showing the beat and pointing the baton upward, which was confusing for the orchestra to follow. The coda was a showcase for Abduraimov brilliant technique, but the conductor began the reinstatement of the main theme too slow and luckily the orchestra was quick enough to pick up right tempo.

Here the noble and majesty opening theme of Elgar first symphony felt like a very slow walk in tempo, and the double basses being too prominent in volume that failed to produce the tranquillo impression. Soon at the violent passage one could sense the orchestra playing was on its own will than following the conductor. Gradually the momentum and directions lost in the tricky time signature changing sections. Sections failed to connect and lacked a clear structure. Tempo was a bit broad for muscular stormy theme despite confident brass playing and some attempt to phrase the music. The conclusion slightly improved with more dynamic contrast and lighter body of sound.

Second movement was more dramatic with the urgency to capture the violent and disturbed atmosphere. A promising start of the strings only third movement that the music flowed but eventually lost the focus. The adapted tempo again dragged and the lyrical themes need more connection than a vertical reading. The enigmatic outlook was compensated by beautiful playing from the strings in tone quality and control. The lento opening of the fourth movement was too slow that became an examination of chord progression without direction. Momentum only picked up again at double time but again lacked dynamic contrast. Brass playing was a bit polite and needed the bite to drive the music forward. Tempos at the return of the noble theme and triumphant conclusion would need more urgency than merely a muscular sound. It did not help when Ashkenazy seems following the orchestra, and struggled with his conducting gestures instead of indicating ahead. Not a resounding finale to mark the season end.