Review - Madama Butterfly (Puccini), Opera Hong Kong, Hong Kong City Hall, 16th & 17th August, 2016

[Do bear with me for a rather long review!]


Cio-cio San: Nancy Yuen (16 Aug), Louise Kwong (17 Aug)
Pinkerton: Adam Diegel
Sharpless: Corey Mckern

Fujian Symphony Orchestra
Opera Hong Kong Chorus
Warren Mok (Producer)
Tsung Yeh (Conductor)
Pamela Recinella (Director)

As one of Giacomo Puccini’s masterpieces, Madama Butterfly has captured the hearts of many in the past century with the heart-breaking story and moving music; and has become a staple in the operatic repertoire across the world.  The recent Opera Hong Kong offering of a semi-staged version was on the whole convincing and well-received, with a full house of audience on both nights.

Nancy Yuen and Louise Kwong, who shared the demanding title role of Cio-cio San on different nights, were undoubtedly the highlights of the performances.  With Cio-cio San being her signature role for over two decades across the world, Yuen impressed the audience as soon as she appeared with the dulcet tones at a high tessitura singing of her joys to be married to Pinkerton.  However, as the performance went on, one could not help but notice the huge contrast between the two registers of her voice.  Whilst the ringing head tone was particularly projected, the chest tones sounded coarse, which took away from the performance. 

Yuen’s rich experience of the character undeniably helped bring across the character confidently with crisp and clear diction. Having said that, Yuen is perhaps more used to fully staged versions, and the present semi-staged setting proved to be a slight hindrance to her acting.  She collaborated well with Carol Lin, who was Suzuki; and their “Flower Duet” was well-balanced and appropriately joyful. 

On the following night, Kwong gave a powerful rendition of Cio-cio San as an innocent, hopelessly in love, yet stubborn 15-year-old Japanese girl and was applauded the moment she started singing.  The faith in Pinkerton Kwong conveyed, the desperation when talking about her son, the outpour of emotions when singing the line “has he forgotten me?”, and the exhilaration when she saw the return of Pinkerton’s ship drew the audience into Cio-cio San’s own emotional world.  One could almost feel her heartbreak. 

She also impressively made the pianissimo top B and C sound as if they were effortless to sing.  The unified tone across her vocal range when singing the famed “Un Bel Di” and the intensity she invested in it made it very touching. 

However, on the whole, Kwong’s diction could be clearer which would help communicate with the audience.  At one point, she also gave off an impression of a mistake in blocking when asking Pinkerton whether people in the West pin up butterflies in her singing.  In any case, it was overall an excellent first performance as Cio-cio San for Kwong.


Generally speaking, the Fujian Symphony Orchestra and the conductor Tusng Yeh did a fantastic job not only in accompanying the singers but also in providing drive and support to the emotions of the storyline.  For example, the opening entries were tight and clear, which gives the opera the urgency needed.  The “humming chorus” in the orchestra when Sharpless read Cio-cio San Pinkerton’s letter was very delicately played.  Throughout the performances, the orchestra set the scenes well with the underlying uneasiness and tension that has been building up for the audience before the anagnorisis of Cio-cio San that Pinkerton never intended to move back to Nagasaki for good. 

On the other hand, there were occasional balance problems, which was exacerbated by the very projected voice of Pinkerton’s.  His voice made other singers seemed relatively quiet at points, in particular the trio shared among Pinkerton, Sharpless and Suzuki towards the end of the opera.  The conductor turned around rather frequently, which occasionally helped to rescued the singers and orchestra from being out of sync.  However, the high frequency of turning back and forth was distracting and unnecessary from the audience’s point of view. 

Although the chorus played a relatively small part in the opera, their voices were well-blended and the difficult “humming chorus” which requires singers to hum on a high B-flat was well-executed. Credits to the Chorus Director Alex Tam. 


Directed by Pamela Recinella, the staging was perhaps the most disappointing part of the two shows.  It must be pointed out that it was very baffling for the audience that the costume of Prince Yomodori resembled a Chinese magua from the Qing Dynasty or the early Republic days.  The choice of the child actor was neither blue-eyed nor blonde, as stated in the libretto, which was also rather confusing.  The audience was pleasantly surprised when Cio-cio San and the train of ladies, as well as Sharpless, made their entrances from the back.  Yet, it looked bizarre and unnatural when the chorus members took out flower petals from their trouser pockets to strew the way for Cio-cio San.  It felt that they could at least do with a basket.  Their white faces also looked slightly eerie.  The female family members of Cio-cio San (As shown in the picture) who had several lines of solo had their straight hair down which did not fit the rest of the cast, especially that of Cio-cio San’s and Suzuki’s which were done up nicely in Japanese style; and this could have been easily solved by YouTube hairstyle tutorials. 

Nevertheless, the effective use of simple lighting on a very limited stage for the cast helped to bring the story across.  The various light changes conveyed the time of the setting (e.g. morning after Cio-cio San’s long overnight wait for Pinkerton) or the emotions (red lights for the Bonze’s fury).  The change in furniture from tatami to an iron-wrought bed, and Japanese style to Western style coffee tables and chairs was also a clear symbol for Cio-cio San’s changes to “an American home”. 

Corey Mckern’s Sharpless (Far right) stood out among the cast.  As the American Consul, he had been very concerned about Cio-cio San’s fate from the start.  His warm tone and sincere acting granted the character a calming and compassionate personality which touched the audience.  Adam Diegel’s Pinkerton delivered the difficult passages with much sensitivity.  The comfortable high notes and the projected lower ranged in a clear tone were a pleasure to listen to.  However, his acting did not quite match up to the level of singing and it felt slightly awkward at points. 

To a large extent, the performance ran smoothly, but not without several hiccoughs.  On the second night, when Goro introduced Suzuki, the cook and butler to Pinkerton, none of the three were on stage.  The orchestra and singers on stage came to a short pause before Suzuki appeared on stage to continue with the opera.  There were also camera noises of the official photographer throughout the two performances, and was especially audible at quiet parts, such as the introduction to the “humming chorus”.  This could be resolved by having pictures taken at the dress rehearsal and could avoid distracting the audience from appreciating the show.

To sum up, the two performances were of high standard in terms of music with the singers and players, but there is perhaps room for improvement for staging, even when in a semi-staged setting, as well as other organisational aspects.  We look forward to Opera Hong Kong’s upcoming Otello by Verdi for more delights and surprises for the audience. 

Photo credits: Opera Hong Kong Facebook Page

Review - National Youth Choir of Great Britain and Cantoría Hong Kong, Academic Community Hall of Hong Kong Baptist University, 13 August 2016

Hymn to St Cecilia (Britten)
Where does the uttered music go? (Walton)
Three Shakespeare Songs (Vaughan Williams)
Who we are (Andrew)
Se tu mi lassi (Monteverdi)
Ecco mormorar l'onde (Monteverdi)
Trois Chansons de Charles d'Orleans (Debussy)
Unicornis Captivatur (Gjeilo)
May Magnificat (Mathias)
Hard by a crystal fountain (Morley)
The lady Oriana (Wilbye)
As Vesta was (Weelkes)
Alleluia (Rose)
3 Chinese folksongs from 'Half Moon Rising'
Star of the County Down (Traditional, arr. Parry)
Encore: The Gallant Weaver (MacMillan)

Cantoría Hong Kong
National Youth Choir of Great Britain (NYCGB)
Dominic Lam (Conductor)
John Winzenburg (Conductor)
Greg Beardsell (Conductor)
Ben Parry (Conductor)


This summer all in a sudden several reputable choirs from UK gave the city a choral treat every few weeks with varieties in repertoire. The NYCGB performance was highly impressive in many ways and breaking the traditional mode of choral singing to an extent. It was welcoming to see them collaborated with highly competent choral singers from local university even under limited rehearsal time. Despite the auditorium acoustic slightly dry and not that resonate, the singing from the nearly eighty strong choir filled the space effectively.

A rich body of sound from the sopranos began Britten's Hymnn to St Cecilia with vigour. Vowels were surprisingly homogenous and bright. Rhythmically precise in the tongue twisting scherzo part and diction was still clear. Solos at the fugue were technically capable and integrated into an effective dialogues. Though I felt Ben Parry should demonstrate the phrasing in his conducting than merely signalling entries and rhythmic counting. His approach resulted in a more vertical reading of the score that not always produce the music direction. A dramatic rendition of Walton's 'Where does the uttered music go?' from the tender opening up to the harmonically rich conclusion. The unified vowels and good intonation sustained a clear harmonic structure throughout. Greg Beardsell was slightly exaggerated with his conducting posture but managed to keep the music flowing.

I felt the Three Shakespeare Songs by Vaughan Williams were more suitable with Ben Parry's conducting in compare to the Britten. Parts were balanced in the 'ding-dong' passage of the first movement and maintained good intonation throughout. The stillness, tenderness and harmonic richness of the lower range were vividly produced in the second movement. The last movement could benefit by a swifter tempo for a dramatic conclusion than merely steady. I generally dislike or not too interest in repetitive music, but adding the visual aspects enhanced my appreciation of Kerry Andrew's Who we are. Tribal dance like choreography and using hand gestures gave a physical musical expression than just a conventional stand still singing posture, but still equally sophisticated and intriguing presentation of the music.

Inevitably, Cantoría Hong Kong had a lot to live up after such a strong start, and their singing was fairly presentable despite a smaller group and varied technical ability. They gave a polished and pleasant account of the Monteverdi madrigals alike one experienced at choral evensong. It would be better if the vowels could sustain longer and unify, adopt a quicker tempo and has more direction in the singing. Tenors sometimes lacked vocal body in their singing that affected the support of energy in sustaining the momentum. Intonation improved and better ensembleship in Debussy's chansons with reinforcement from the NYCGB fellowship octet, but diction occasionally sounded more Latin than French. Alto solo had a beautiful timbre with the right colour and projection at the intimate second movement. A slightly messy entrance of the third movement but rectified for a dramatic conclusion with good musical phrasing. The ensemble sounded more at home in Latin during Gjeilo's Unicornis Captivatur, and sopranos' singing were more flexible to shape the music. They successfully built up the momentum from the tender opening towards the first climatic 'alleluia'. Though the produced tone in the second section was not always radiant and tenors sometimes risking to go flat. Tempo also dragged along and the built up from lower voices seems lacking direction until the final alleluia for the energetic coda.

I had not come across William Mathia's The May Magnificat until this highly convincing performance by NYCGB and what a discovery. Harmonically complex with a muscular bright tone throughout. The first choir sang the colourful English text alternated with the second in Latin. The full choir again displayed itself as a highly disciplined body with rhythmic precision, sustained the vocal energy throughout and observed the dynamic contrast faithfully. Diction was bright and homogenous to let the music to ring in a radiant sound. In turn, a chamber choir was formed with lesser members without conductor to sing the first Elizabethan madrigal of the evening by Morley. Voices blended together with the desired vocal support and volume, also there were thoughts in place to phrase the music meaningfully. A septet followed to sing Willbye's madrigal but took time to warm up their voices and adjusted before complimenting each other. Sopranos were pushing the pitch very sharp and even overpowering in the third madrigal as tribute to the monarch by Weelkes. Though never feel too heavy even the full choir involved and rarely a big group could sound so well in polyphony works.

Alleluia by James Rose sounded rather similar to the compositional style of Gabriel Jackson for bright long vowel and illuminated sound landscape. The full choir and octet successfully in built up gradually the long wordless crescendo up to the ultimate climax. Very bright vowels again in the Chinese folksongs but I did not find the words easy to identify. Good momentum and intonation even the tempo was on the broad side. There was a sense of proudness when Star of the County Down was sung, also the group loosen up allowing the music to swing. An emotional and tender closing was chosen instead to finish the superlative evening with a Scottish fervour by MacMillan's The Gallant Weaver. The sweet melody was given a twist and as ever the choir maintained good intonation in the final conclusion. 

Review - 2016 Munich Opera Festival, La Juive (Halévy), Bayerische Staatsoper, Webcast

Rachel - Aleksandra Kurzak
Éléazar - Roberto Alagna
Prince Léopold - John Osborn
Princess Eudoxie - Vera-Lotte Böcker
Cardinal Brogni - Ain Anger
Ruggiero - Johannes Kammler
Albert - Tareq Nazmi

Choir and Orchestra of the Bavarian State Opera
Bertrand de Billy (Conductor)
Calixto Bieito (Director)


Bieito's staging of 'The Jewess', arguably Halévy most successful opera at his time, focuses on group/cult intolerance than merely a religious conflict. The employment of a big wall, alike the Israeli West Bank barrier, as the prominent stage set could be controversial by its intention and might perceive not sympathetic to the political reasoning. Though the wall is not a random thought but a reference of the palace wall mentioned by Eudoxie in act three, when she anxiously discovering the secret affection between Rachel and Léopold. It is also the object serves as a metaphorical representation of the western wall in Jerusalem, but without any explicit religious symbolism at the Passover scene. The physical appearance of concrete planks marks architectural brutalism that neither inviting and chilling as the prison cell in act four. When the biblical tale of Christ throwing traders from the temple is being mentioned, the crowd beat Éléazar with holly in act one, and later in act three humiliate Rachel by throwing at her torn pages of the bible. The crowd homogenous appearance in dark coloured wearings and are blindfolded make them blind followers of order with hatred against outsiders. Ongoing hostility, religious extremism and tragic consequences lead to further misunderstanding, which indirectly reflect the current difficult situation of the middle east. Thus, the wall indirectly stands as a symbol to mark violence and conflicts as its witness.

I do not think Bieito is particularly after judgmental debate, but questions the dilemma of whose are the oppressors/prosecutors and their victims. First the general public repeatedly humiliates Éléazar with accusations and even beating him, he later revenge not to reveal the true identity of Rachel, until Brogni mistakenly has his actual daughter burnt to death in the cage. Both men experience their loss but Brogni seems more sympathetic and attempt for reconciliation than Éléazar. The cardinal told the crowd to stop mocking the jew and touchingly washes his feet to beg revealing the truth. Though his position also makes himself to condemn and excommunicate Léopold, whip Rachel with a rope and execute her. One would sympathise with Éléazar of his treatment by the crowd, but not his accusation of Léopold, making profit from selling jewellery to Eudoxie, and refuses to make peace with the Brogni. The implicit moral message here is probably that taking the advantage of past sufferings and general sympathy on racial identity, but unwilling to do good nor attempt to repair the damage, do not invite future reconciliation nor forgiveness.


Rachel is the ultimate victim but not a straight forward portrayal with strangeness. She cannot stand the singing of Te Deum at the beginning as if an annoying voice troubles her mind. While the crowd humiliates Éléazar, she crawled around the stage and mop the ground for whatever reason before facing the wall. I am not sure whether she is probably too frighten to halt the violence, or this is all a nightmare and feels being trap within the situation. Though in act two she displays more inner emotions and humanity by trying to reconcile Léopold and Éléazar. The video projection image of her being push to the ground at the opening of act three foretells her tragic end. Her rage at Eudoxie and reveals the affection with Léopold have turned against her innocence. The finale is highly dramatic and moving to see her hairs being cut before burnt in the cage, alike a lamb being slaughtered as the video projection demonstrates.

As a whole, message of the moment interest Bieito to display in full, especially for intellectual stimulation and interest, but I am not sure whether it has always produced a coherent tale and some unanswered corners. The blindfolded crowd, as fervent religious cult, force children in white to perform baptism. Albert shows signs of hesitation and his head is pushed into a water bucket by a spectator. One understand an adult is more unwilling to convert than a child with no choice but to obey, though how that relate a person from a different faith background suppress by the dominant power is unclear. Brogni as religious leader can tell the crowd to stop the attacks on Éléazar, but here seems far from showing the superior authority he holds and assuming everyone have an underlying social rule. His relation with Rachel is also awkward that being sympathetic and protective in act one, but later whips her when she rages at Eudoxie of her jewellery to Léopold. Both Eudoxie and Éléazar have blood on their hands after putting inside the wall holes, but I cannot tell whether metaphorically showing they indirectly trigger the execution of Rachel or not.


When Eudoxie bags Rachel at the prison scene to save Léopold but both love and hate each other in the same time, Aleksandra Kurzak sings with a wonderful sense of phrasing, breath control, projection and sits comfortable with the tessitura. She is emotional and passionate at Rachel's confrontation of Léopold at the Passover scene up to their love vow. A dramatic characterisation of her being a vulnerable woman desperately wants to receive the trust and faith of her affection from the disguised prince. Though her top notes are not always secure with intonation and some tuning issues during the trio pleading for reconciliation. Brilliant singing from Vera-Lotte Böcker with her effortless coloratura and clear diction. Ain Anger occasionally lacks the vocal colour of a bass with a more baritone like timbre. Roberto Alagna's timbre is rather unique and not much of warmth in tone. His aria on recalling Rachel's past and negotiating with his conscience is not always secure. He struggles to sustain the line and sounds strain as the vocal range goes up. The vocalisation seems lost and hear the words being said more than sung. John Osborn's singing is rather underwhelming in projection even on the microphones and probably the weakest among all the principals. Wonderful choral singing that made a big impact with the sheer body of sound. As always Bertrand de Billy is able to draw a dramatic rendition from the orchestral playing and displays the music brilliancy at its fullness. 

Review - The Choir of King’s College (Cambridge), Stephen Cleobury, Louise Kwong, Hugo Herman-Wilson, Grand Hall of Lee Shau Kee Lecture Centre (The University of Hong Kong), 27 July 2016

Laudibus in sanctions (Byrd)
Loquebantur variis linguis (Tallis)
Hymn to St Cecilia (Britten)
Ein Deutsches Requiem, version with piano four hands accompaniment (Brahms)

The Choir of King’s College (Cambridge)
Louise Kwong (Soprano solo)
Hugo Herman-Wilson (Baritone solo)
Stephen Cleobury (Conductor)


King's revisit of Hong Kong this time gave a shockingly disappointing performance and did not live up to its reputation. Although one should not dampen the spirit and confidence of young aspiring choristers with strong criticism, any excuse could not hide the fact that the choir has some fundamental problems in singing technique, blending, ensembleship and even the musical leadership. The programme of the first half struck a right balance with the Brahms Requiem later. It began with Byrd's outward jubilant god praising psalm 150, followed by Tallis vesperal response for Pentecost to celebrate the descent of holy spirit upon the apostles, then Britten's intimate and inward praying of St Cecilia, patron saint of music, before a personal dealing of grief and death in the non liturgical requiem.

Basses delivered confident singing with support in the Byrd and voices blended well, but trebles were feeble and lacked presence. Poor intonation throughout and sluggish in tempo. The upper voice parts sung in variety of pitches and all over the place. Generally failed to craft the structure of the piece neither any sense of sectional dialogue. The beginning of the Tallis was chaotic and coordination problems happened among choir. There was no direction in the singing and structurally shapeless. It was alike showering with notes but no communication among parts. Cleobury's conducting did not indicate phrasing but rhythmic counting only. Trebles remained very breathy in their timbre and underwhelming in vocal projection. The men's chanting had the right flow with words and more unified in diction.

Shaky start with pitch problems in the first few notes of the Britten and vowels were not homogeneous. A rather vertical reading of the score and strangely, alike the trebles, the tenors and altos sounded thin and lacked presence in projection. Diction in the second section was poor and trebles struggled with intonation. Again the singing lacked direction and rushing through the text without singing the full value of notes. It neither manage to build up the momentum and crescendo for the climax. The treble solo did not possess a radiant tone and timid in projection. Towards the end tempo gradually became sluggish again, and part solos failed to deliver some quality individual singing and technically insecure.

The piano solo opening of the requiem would probably need more urgency than being steady. The choir entry did not deliver the body of sound and trebles remained timid in their singing. Although arguably a collegiate choir differed from large choral groups with a leaner and lighter sound texture, vocal projection was problematic here that far from filling the hall. Tenors' timbre were noticeably not complimenting each other and did not blend with rest of the choir. Intonation improved in the second movement 'Denn alles Fleisch ist wie Gras' and the choir found itsfeet here. Though the body of sound still failed to make an impact and individual voices sticking out. Their diction in German was presentable but slightly wet for my taste. Energy and direction did not always sustain in the fugue, and far from building the exuberant climatic calling for eternal joy over sorrow.

Beautiful singing from the baritone solo and gave a poetic reading of the third movement 'Herr, lehre doch mich', but tenors simply could not blend together in their singing. Intonation towards the end of the movement gradually worsened as the vocal range went up. Everything went downhill from the fourth movement onward. The better known fourth movement 'Wie lieblich sind deine Wohnungen' sounded very dull here and also lazy in diction, which affected the tuning. The score reading was vertical again and the choir not singing through the line. Cleobury might have assumed the music would speak for itself, but that would require him to signal the phrasing than being economical and vague in his conducting.

Despite one would prefer a lyric soprano than dramatic one, Louise Kwong gave the best live account of the fifth movement 'Ihr habt nun Traurigkeit' I had encountered in live so far. The part tessitura was vocally demanding for the soloist to sing rather high with only a short build up from mid range. She was secured with intonation and delivered the desired projection, though slightly forceful to nail the top notes and rather muddy in diction. The choir also began to sound tired and sometimes fraction behind the piano playing, which later turned into one chasing the another. The focus and energy faded as the sixth movement went on. The judgement day passage was not dramatically realised by the singing and trebles were flat at the cry of death. The fugue conclusion was chaotic with poor intonation and choppy singing. Tenors were not confident in their entry and inaccurate with notes. The choir again failed to blend together nor manage to maintain the momentum.

One suspect the choir did not prepare well enough to familiarise itself with the music in the end. Diction was completely out of the window at the supposed emotional last movement 'Selig sind die Toten', and neither the singing was radiant nor memorable. Trebles struggled with intonation throughout and as a whole it failed to make any impression. It did not work when the vocal colour remained bright only throughout, but lacked differentiation and musical shape. Words failed me to conclude how unconvincing this performance went, and the tickets were overpriced judging by the poor artistic quality being given, except the two soloists redeemed it from further disaster.